Can an EcoHack Cut Global Warming from Aviation in Half?

The aviation industry is the backbone of the global economy, but for years it has been criticized for its climatewarming carbon emissions. In response, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is now rolling out CORSIA, a plan to make flying carbon neutral. Carbon offsets, combined with newer fuel efficient aircraft now entering service, will transform aviation into the most efficient-emissions form of passenger travel in many parts of the world. This is especially true in Canada with the large distances between major cities, where the only viable substitute to flying is often driving.

Two USAF F-15 Eagles intercept two MiG 29 aircraft August 1989. Contrails at high altitudes turn into cirrus clouds that could add to global warming. The majority of flights do not create visible contrails.

In response to these dramatic improvements, critics point to new research into contrails and how they could potentially be causing more global warming than a flights carbon emissions. Why are contrails important and how can a simple Flight Level EcoHack being suggested in this article all but remove this threat? 

Under the right humidity conditions, aircraft can create contrails as they soar high in thin cold air. Water vapor quickly condenses from the air compressed in a jet engines exhaust into ice crystals to form cirrus clouds. These high clouds can last for minutes, hours or even days. Unlike low-level clouds that have a net cooling effect (the heat energy cannot penetrate these thicker layers), all cirrus clouds trap heat, thanks to the ice crystals inside them that reflect back heat radiated from the surface. Cirrus clouds are usually too thin to reflect sunlight heat energy back into space.

Authors Picture take from flight level 280 in a jet not creating a contrail, of aircraft only a few thousand feet higher creating contrails.

Ice crystals in contrails formed by current jet engines are much smaller than those in naturally occurring cirrus cloud, and can take longer to settle to lower altitudes. They can be created at altitudes ranging from 16,500 ft to 45,000 ft but typically occur at altitudes above 25,000 ft. In pilot lingo 25,000 ft is also known as FL (flight level) 250. For contrails to form cirrus clouds, an aircraft would typically need to be flying above FL250 and in the right humidity and temperature conditions. The likelihood of these conditions existing increases in tropical conditions and decreases as you fly further north. Typically, flying at or below FL250 removes the global warming threat created by contrails. This is the Flight Level EcoHack.

In Canada, if you fly below FL250, cirrus clouds from contrails will not form in the first place. Doing simple adjustments like this to reduce global warming while still achieving the goal of moving passengers to a destination is called “EcoHacking”. Passengers still fly safely to their destinations and global warming is reduced by adjusting the flight level based upon temperature and humidity to avoid creating cirrus clouds.
This EcoHack is a simple rule that can be applied
by pilots and ATC ( Air Traffic Control ) across the planet. It is also the opposite of everything a pilot has been trained to do.  Pilots are trained to fly as high as possible to reduce fuel burn, minimize real emissions and increase true airspeed.

This EcoHack does remove the last argument being put in the way of aviation’s goal of becoming the most efficient people mover ever invented.  Measured by fuel burned per passenger KM travel, passenger aircraft are among the most efficient way to travel. A Q400 aircraft operated by Porter airlines is a poster child for emissions efficiency.  It can average 3.4 liters per 100 km per passenger and this aircraft is not even certified to fly above 25,000 ft!  The new A220 passenger jet can get to 2 liters per 100 km per passenger at 36,000 ft. Compare that to the average Canadian new car that gets 8.9 liters per 100km and needs a well maintained road.

Efficiency would be reduced if flying was restricted to FL250, with some aircraft burning up to 30% more fuel, producing 30% more real emissions. A far cry from the 2 fold warming effect claimed by some contrail doomsday criers. Getting around weather could also be more difficult so it’s important to validate the contrail science quickly.

A carbon offset for a round trip from Toronto to Vancouver costs $20. In a rush to up sell consumers some websites are offering contrail offsets ranging from 1.3 to 2 times the base cost. Without validated science reputable companies such as WestJet do not currently offer this option.

Flying is also the safest and fastest way to travel. This combination is turning flying into the preferred mode of passenger transportation with flights expected to triple by 2050. With the FL250 EcoHack, this is still true even if the claim, still being verified, that contrails are a long term global warming issue is true. Alternatively the work being done at NOAA and elsewhere could create an atmospheric model able to predict contrail persistence and enable safe utilization of higher flight levels. 

The one big glitch to aviation’s bright future is the lack of aviation infrastructure able to handle the expected three-fold increase in air travel worldwide. Toronto is a classic example of aviation congestion, and the excess fuel burn and emissions this can create. It is time to stop procrastinating and build the infrastructure our growing nation needs. It is time to build Pickering Airport east of Toronto, and expand other airports across the country to maximize the emissions efficiency of air travel.


Do contrails affect conditions surface?

ICSA on aviations contribution to global warming.

Are airplane contrails aviations dirty secret?

IATA Carbon Offset Guidelines 

IACO Carbon Emissions Calculator

NOAA article on predicting contrail persistence 


Looking Northwest from the hamlet of Brougham at the public lands north of Highway 7 set aside for a new airport in Pickering East of Toronto. Air travel is now the safest, fastest most emissions efficient way to travel any distance in Canada but requires new infrastructure to support anticipation growth and to reduce congestion.

One thought on “Can an EcoHack Cut Global Warming from Aviation in Half?

Comments are closed.